Long‐term follow‐up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression
Identifieur interne : 000D59 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D58; suivant : 000D60Long‐term follow‐up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression
Auteurs : P. Richard Schuurman [Pays-Bas] ; D. Andries Bosch [Pays-Bas] ; Maruschka P. Merkus [Pays-Bas] ; Johannes D. Speelman [Pays-Bas]Source :
- Movement Disorders [ 0885-3185 ] ; 2008-06-15.
English descriptors
Abstract
Thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for treatment of tremor due to Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and multiple sclerosis were compared in a randomized trial. The symptomatic and functional outcome was studied after 5 years of follow‐up. Sixty‐eight patients were treated (45 Parkinson's disease, 13 essential tremor, 10 multiple sclerosis) by thalamotomy (n = 34) or thalamic stimulation (n = 34). After 5 years, 48 patients were available for follow‐up. The primary outcome measure was change in functional status measured by the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), scores ranging from 0 to 60. Secondary outcome measures were tremor severity, frequency of complications, and patients' assessment of the outcome. The mean difference in FAI scores between thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy was 4.4 (95% CI: 1.1–7.7) after 6 months, 3.3 (95% CI: −0.03–6.6) after 2 years and 4.0 (95% CI: 0.3–7.7) after 5 years in favor of stimulation. Tremor suppression was equally effective after both procedures, and stable in Parkinson patients. In ET and multiple sclerosis, a diminished effect of stimulation was observed in half of the patients. There were six stimulation equipment‐related complications, but neurological side effects of surgery were higher after thalamotomy. Subjective outcome‐assessment by the patients was more favorable in the stimulation group. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/mds.22059
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Long‐term follow‐up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression</title><author><name sortKey="Schuurman, P Richard" sort="Schuurman, P Richard" uniqKey="Schuurman P" first="P. Richard" last="Schuurman">P. Richard Schuurman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bosch, D Andries" sort="Bosch, D Andries" uniqKey="Bosch D" first="D. Andries" last="Bosch">D. Andries Bosch</name></author><author><name sortKey="Merkus, Maruschka P" sort="Merkus, Maruschka P" uniqKey="Merkus M" first="Maruschka P." last="Merkus">Maruschka P. Merkus</name></author><author><name sortKey="Speelman, Johannes D" sort="Speelman, Johannes D" uniqKey="Speelman J" first="Johannes D." last="Speelman">Johannes D. Speelman</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:BEBAD44BDCC45A1BCD703EB8DE8673BA8742C25B</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/mds.22059</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/BEBAD44BDCC45A1BCD703EB8DE8673BA8742C25B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">001E86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001B96</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000D59</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Long‐term follow‐up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression</title><author><name sortKey="Schuurman, P Richard" sort="Schuurman, P Richard" uniqKey="Schuurman P" first="P. Richard" last="Schuurman">P. Richard Schuurman</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bosch, D Andries" sort="Bosch, D Andries" uniqKey="Bosch D" first="D. Andries" last="Bosch">D. Andries Bosch</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurosurgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Merkus, Maruschka P" sort="Merkus, Maruschka P" uniqKey="Merkus M" first="Maruschka P." last="Merkus">Maruschka P. Merkus</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Speelman, Johannes D" sort="Speelman, Johannes D" uniqKey="Speelman J" first="Johannes D." last="Speelman">Johannes D. Speelman</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement><region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Movement Disorders</title><title level="j" type="sub">Official Journal of the Movement Disorder Society</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Mov. Disord.</title><idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno><idno type="eISSN">1531-8257</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-06-15">2008-06-15</date><biblScope unit="volume">23</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">8</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1146">1146</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1153">1153</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno></series><idno type="istex">BEBAD44BDCC45A1BCD703EB8DE8673BA8742C25B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/mds.22059</idno><idno type="ArticleID">MDS22059</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0885-3185</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Parkinson</term><term>essential tremor</term><term>multiple sclerosis</term><term>thalamic stimulation</term><term>thalamotomy</term><term>tremor</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="fr">Thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for treatment of tremor due to Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and multiple sclerosis were compared in a randomized trial. The symptomatic and functional outcome was studied after 5 years of follow‐up. Sixty‐eight patients were treated (45 Parkinson's disease, 13 essential tremor, 10 multiple sclerosis) by thalamotomy (n = 34) or thalamic stimulation (n = 34). After 5 years, 48 patients were available for follow‐up. The primary outcome measure was change in functional status measured by the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), scores ranging from 0 to 60. Secondary outcome measures were tremor severity, frequency of complications, and patients' assessment of the outcome. The mean difference in FAI scores between thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy was 4.4 (95% CI: 1.1–7.7) after 6 months, 3.3 (95% CI: −0.03–6.6) after 2 years and 4.0 (95% CI: 0.3–7.7) after 5 years in favor of stimulation. Tremor suppression was equally effective after both procedures, and stable in Parkinson patients. In ET and multiple sclerosis, a diminished effect of stimulation was observed in half of the patients. There were six stimulation equipment‐related complications, but neurological side effects of surgery were higher after thalamotomy. Subjective outcome‐assessment by the patients was more favorable in the stimulation group. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country><region><li>Hollande-Septentrionale</li></region><settlement><li>Amsterdam</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Hollande-Septentrionale"><name sortKey="Schuurman, P Richard" sort="Schuurman, P Richard" uniqKey="Schuurman P" first="P. Richard" last="Schuurman">P. Richard Schuurman</name></region><name sortKey="Bosch, D Andries" sort="Bosch, D Andries" uniqKey="Bosch D" first="D. Andries" last="Bosch">D. Andries Bosch</name><name sortKey="Merkus, Maruschka P" sort="Merkus, Maruschka P" uniqKey="Merkus M" first="Maruschka P." last="Merkus">Maruschka P. Merkus</name><name sortKey="Speelman, Johannes D" sort="Speelman, Johannes D" uniqKey="Speelman J" first="Johannes D." last="Speelman">Johannes D. Speelman</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/ParkinsonV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D59 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D59 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= ParkinsonV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:BEBAD44BDCC45A1BCD703EB8DE8673BA8742C25B
|texte= Long‐term follow‐up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |